Pacifist Posse

2 January 2008

The violence flaw?

Filed under: Other sites — Tags: , — John Lloyd @ 7:24 am

I guess I ought to read Our Tragic Flaw by Parke Burgess.

Looking deeply into these questions, Our Tragic Flaw locates the root cause of our collective perversity in the “logic of violence.” Embedded in our biology, psychology, and culture, this logic is the tragic flaw that threatens humankind. But author Parke Burgess does not accept that this flaw inevitably dooms us to self-destruction. Another way is possible, now as never before. The logic of violence can, in fact, be transcended through a conscious and intentional process of deepening self-awareness, and a corresponding process of sharing power and increasing collaboration in our social relations.

I don’t know whether I agree with the premise that there’s this deep psychological cause, but I agree with the idea that eliminating violence is desirable.

11 December 2007

USPP

Filed under: Organizations,Other sites — John Lloyd @ 6:00 am

There is a United States Pacifist Party (USPP)! Who knew? Bradford Lyttle was the 2004 candidate for president. It appears to be a bit of smallish operation, but it’s probably bigger than the PP.

There is an extensive list of links for organizations and such. Some of them may be out of date, as the page footer carries a December 2000 update date.

9 December 2007

Philosophical sources on pacifism

Filed under: Observations — John Lloyd @ 7:30 am

I was looking at philosophy sites on another topic (epistomology, if you must know) and came upon an entry on pacifism. I gathered notes about it from several similar sources and they are here.

Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy:

Pacifism is a commitment to peace and opposition to war. Our ordinary language allows a diverse set of beliefs and commitments to be held together under the general rubric of pacifism. This article will explain the family resemblance among the variety of pacifisms. It will locate pacifism within deontological and consequentialist approaches to ethics. And it will consider and reply to objections to pacifism.

Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy:

Pacifism is the theory that peaceful rather than violent or belligerent relations should govern human intercourse and that arbitration, surrender, or migration should be used to resolve disputes. Pacifism is as much an element of Western thinking as is the notion of Just War Theory, the argument that the state may legitimately or morally bear arms. While most people accept the necessity of war, conscientious objectors (or martyrs in much of European history) have often been accorded a special recognition for their moral bravery in refusing to take up arms.

—Garth Kemerling of Philosophy Pages:

Opposition to war, killing, and violence; support for peace {Lat. pax}. Pacifism may be defended deontologically as respect for the value of human life, on the consequentialist grounds that the consequences of violence are clearly harmful, or personally as a significant component of good character.

Columbia Encyclopedia (6th edition):

[Pacifism is] advocacy of opposition to war through individual or collective action against militarism. Although complete, enduring peace is the goal of all pacifism, the methods of achieving it differ. Some groups oppose international war but advocate revolution for suppressed nationalities; others are willing to support defensive but not offensive war; others oppose all war, but believe in maintaining a police force; still others believe in no coercive or disciplinary force at all.

— Jeff Landauer and Joseph Rowlands at Importance of Philosophy (interestingly, these guys place pacifism among “misbegotten notions”):

Pacifism is the moral principle that the use of force is wrong for any reason. This applies to both the initiation of force, as well as defensive or retaliatory force. If your life is being threatened, pacifism holds that you should not defend yourself. If someone has stolen from you, pacifism holds that you should not retrieve your property. If someone has murdered other people, pacifism holds that nothing should be done about it. Pacifism is the moral principle that attempts to permanently disarm its practitioners, leaving them helpless and at the mercy of any thug.

Wikipedia:

Pacifism is the opposition to war or violence as a means of settling disputes or gaining advantage. Pacifism covers a spectrum of views ranging from the belief that international disputes can and should be peacefully resolved; to calls for the abolition of the institutions of the military and war; to opposition to any organization of society through governmental force (anarchist or libertarian pacifism); to rejection of the use of physical violence to obtain political, economic or social goals; to opposition to violence under any circumstance, including defense of self and others.

27 October 2007

teaching compassion

Filed under: Uncategorized — Hannahla @ 1:33 pm

Listening to “What do you know…Not Much” on NPR this day, I heard an interview with the author of a book just out iterating some of the findings of the Unlimited Love Institute.
I am delighted to see actual research going on currently and want to share the website with you:
http://www.unlimitedloveinstitute.org

You may want to check it out!

18 October 2007

Holdrege Lecture at Gandhi

Filed under: Events,News,Organizations,People — John Lloyd @ 11:22 am

Mahatma Gandhi Center for Global Nonviolence (Lecture in the History and Philosophy of Hinduism) and College of Arts and Letters (Visiting Scholars Program) at James Madison University will host a visit by Barbara A. Holdrege, Associate Professor of Religious Studies, Chair of the South Asian Studies Committee, and Director of the Center for the Analysis of Sacred Space at the University of California, Santa Barbara. Professor Holdrege will give a public lecture entitled “South Asia and the Middle East: Connecting Cultures Outside of and in Spite of the West” (see abstract below).

The lecture will be held at 6:30 p.m. Tuesday, October 23, 2007 in CI/ISAT 159 at James Madison University.

Admission: Free and open to all

———————————–

Lecture Abstract:
South Asia and the Middle East: Connecting Cultures Outside of and in Spite of the West, by Barbara A. Holdrege

Wilhelm Halbfass, in his landmark study India and Europe, explores the history of intellectual encounters between India and Europe from classical antiquity to the twentieth century. He concludes with a discussion of the “global predicament of Westernization” in the contemporary period, reflecting more specifically on the problems that the so called “Europeanization of the earth” presents for both European and Indian partners in the “dialogue.” The lecture will explore the critical necessity of going beyond the European horizon of such dialogue and undertaking an alternative form of cross-cultural encounter that does not privilege Europe as a principal partner but rather investigates instead India’s connections with other cultures whose distinctive histories have unfolded outside of, inside of, and in spite of the West. This type of comparative enterprise shifts the focus from India and Europe to South Asia and the Middle East and explores the ongoing economic, political, social, cultural, and religious connections that linked these two regions long before the “rise of the West.” The lecture will consider the role of comparative study in critically interrogating two related sets of paradigms that have assumed the status of dominant discourses in the human sciences in Europe and North America since the nineteenth century: the Eurocentric paradigms that have dominated scholarship in the social sciences and humanities; and the Protestant Christian paradigms that have dominated scholarship in religious studies more specifically. One of the important tasks of comparative study in this context is to challenge scholars to become more critically self conscious of the legacy of these dominant paradigms that lingers in our categories and taxonomies and to reconfigure our scholarly discourses to include a multiplicity of epistemic perspectives. The lecture will suggest two comparative projects that can contribute to dismantling the dominant paradigms. First, comparative studies of South Asia and the Middle East can provide the basis for developing alternative epistemologies to the Eurocentric paradigms that have dominated scholarship in the human sciences. Second, comparative studies of Hindu and Jewish traditions — religious traditions rooted in South Asia and the Middle East, respectively — can provide the basis for developing alternative epistemologies to the Protestant-based paradigms that have dominated the academic study of religion.

« Newer PostsOlder Posts »

Powered by WordPress

Bad Behavior has blocked 16 access attempts in the last 7 days.